<div>
Communities experience cascading losses when natural hazards trigger simultaneous damage to the built environment, critical lifelines, and the social systems that shape preparedness, response, and recovery. Yet, post-event evidence is often heavily fragmented due to data unavailability and siloed reporting. Critical information—such as missing physical measurements of structural damage, incomplete environmental observations of inundation extents and debris, and isolated human-centered records like eyewitness accounts—remains disconnected. This research addresses the core problem of how to seamlessly fuse heterogeneous human-centered data with physical sensing to improve the predictability of equitable recovery timelines for lifelines.
</div>
<div>
To achieve this, the paper proposes a human-centered, multi-scale workflow that integrates these disparate data streams into an operational digital twin. This digital twin represents affected communities and supports resilience assessment and decision-making, specifically focusing on the case studies of wind-driven residential damage and its impact on power-grid restoration in coastal communities. This study leverages curated datasets from the NHERI DesignSafe Data Depot, including StEER Hurricane Michael reconnaissance data and high-resolution Hurricane Ian building-damage records. To establish a defensible baseline for resilience assessment, we prioritize the physical chain of causality: wind load, pressure, component demand, and subsequent failure.
</div>
<div>
The proposed workflow operates in three primary stages. First, it ethically and rapidly captures human-centered data through structured interviews, community reporting, and privacy-preserving digital traces. Second, it harmonizes this information with remote and in-situ sensing to comprehensively characterize hazard intensity, exposure, and damage. Third, it utilizes multi-scale modeling to couple household- and facility-level functionality with community-wide lifeline interdependencies, enabling detailed scenario-based recovery analysis.
</div>
<div>
To ensure rigor and defensibility, this study explicitly excludes monetary loss and long-term climate migration. Instead, the scope is intentionally limited to the first 30 days of the response-to-recovery transition to provide immediate, actionable insights for early-stage intervention. By linking hybrid simulations of representative components to data-assimilated network models, the framework provides decision-relevant indicators for equitable recovery planning. Anticipated key findings indicate that integrating human-centric records with physical&nbsp;sensing significantly reduces uncertainty in predicting initial lifeline restoration timelines. Ultimately, this work contributes to the natural hazards literature by providing a validated, ground-up engineering workflow that favors defensible assumptions over purely sophisticated modeling.
</div>